Follow Amy:

We’re deep into the IVF process now, and this past weekend, doctors harvested my eggs.  They didn’t even buy me dinner first.

Dave and I conceived our first child naturally, in a cartoonishly ideal way: on vacation in Waikiki, waves crashing outside our balcony, the scent of fresh plumeria and gardenias wafting through the air.  Hawaii seemed like such an auspicious origin — a 4-star Garden of Eden — and I seriously considered naming our baby “Leilani.”

This time around, our DNA is being combined in a petri dish without so much as a Barry White song to set the mood.

I’m not complaining – I feel extremely fortunate to live in a time when advanced reproductive technology can compensate for my misspent youth.   But the process does feel different: more clinical, not as romantic, though in no way less miraculous.

I was seven years old when Louise Brown, the world’s first “test-tube baby” was born and I distinctly remember her being big news, even if I didn’t totally understand the science part.  (Hell, I still don’t understand it and I’m going through it.)

As a child, I was always fascinated by the miracle of life, and the pages of our Random House Encyclopedia outlining reproduction were dog-eared and worn.   I don’t recall a big shocking ah-ha moment of finding out how babies were made—it was something I always knew, a story my mom and the encyclopedia told me slowly and gently, over many years.

I look forward to having those conversations with Viv, and with baby #2 if we are so fortunate, but I can’t help but wonder – are those two different conversations?    In other words, does the IVF kid need to know about the IVF?   Or is the method of conception as irrelevant (and gross) as whether mom and dad did it missionary or doggie style?

Pin It on Pinterest